Modern VR headsets are equipped with a variety of sensors to enable immersive experiences. However, potentially sensitive data is also collected in the process:
This data allows conclusions to be drawn about the behavior and preferences of users, which is particularly relevant for companies under data protection law.
Meta's VR headsets, such as the Meta Quest series, are often criticized for collecting extensive data. One central aspect is the Constant connection to the Internetwithout a data protection-compliant system such as Meta for Work is required.
Without Meta for Work the Meta Quest expects to be permanently connected to the WLAN. It remains unclear what data is transmitted to Meta, including:
The use of Meta for Work provides a remedy by restricting data flows and making them more controllable. Companies can work locally, regulate transferred data and introduce access controls.
The Apple Vision Pro stands out with its mixed reality capabilities and a strong data protection concept. Data like Eye tracking-Information is processed locally and does not leave the device. Nevertheless, there are limitations, as the glasses store comprehensive environmental data and are integrated into a closed ecosystem.
For data-sensitive applications, devices such as the Pico 4 Ultra Enterprise or the HTC Vive privacy-friendly alternatives:
Virtual reality offers immense opportunities, but harbors data protection risks. Companies should rely on solutions such as Meta for Work or alternatives such as the Pico 4 Ultra Enterprise and HTC Vive consider using the advantages of VR technology while protecting privacy.
Are you interested in developing a virtual reality or 360° application? You may still have questions about budget and implementation. Feel free to contact me.
I am looking forward to you
Clarence Dadson CEO Design4real